Residents should have received a letter (plain white envelope) from the developer of the LMC site Barry O'Shea of C.J.O'Shea & Co Ltd. It states that demolition of the LMC site will commence at the end of August 2011 and will go on until January 2012. Given that a basement car park will be created a great deal of earth will be removed. More information from O'Shea will follow later.
The planning applications relating to the site can be found at planning.hounslow.gov.uk/planning_search.aspx. A search will need to be made. Use post code "W4 1PU" and then look for all the entries referring to 104, or 104-108, Chiswick High Road.
Note that the tree to the right of the garage entrance is going to be felled, the reason stated being that "The Arboricultural Officer has inspected this tree and advised [LBH] that the tree to the right of the entrance to the garage is riddled with Ustulina deusta, which is a serious basal decay fungi and has rendered this particular tree liable to fail, therefore it should be felled". The tree has nesting birds so will be felled later, perhaps September. In the mean time the trunks have been pruned to enable access to the site.
Friday, 5 August 2011
Saturday, 2 July 2011
Parking changes update #2
The Chiswick Area Committee meeting that was to address parking changes in the East Chiswick (EC) CPZ took place on 28th June as reported on this blog here. The item has been postponed until the next meeting on Tuesday 27th September 2011, the reason cited being that further consultation was needed.
As detailed in the documentation submitted (see Hounslow site) another option has emerged that involves extending the 3 street Thornton and Mayfield Avenues plus Upham Park Road zone retaining the current restricted parking hours of 9-19h. This extension could include neighbouring Ennismore Av, Merton Av and Homefield Road. The attraction of this is that a 6 street zone would be less restrictive on parking options.
Also buried in the detail is that splitting the EC CPZ requires £5,000 to £10,000 to be found and a loss in revenue of £60,000 from visitor permits. This money would need to be saved elsewhere by the council and must make the no change option very likely, at least for now.
Updates will be posted when we have them.
As detailed in the documentation submitted (see Hounslow site) another option has emerged that involves extending the 3 street Thornton and Mayfield Avenues plus Upham Park Road zone retaining the current restricted parking hours of 9-19h. This extension could include neighbouring Ennismore Av, Merton Av and Homefield Road. The attraction of this is that a 6 street zone would be less restrictive on parking options.
Also buried in the detail is that splitting the EC CPZ requires £5,000 to £10,000 to be found and a loss in revenue of £60,000 from visitor permits. This money would need to be saved elsewhere by the council and must make the no change option very likely, at least for now.
Updates will be posted when we have them.
Monday, 6 June 2011
Parking changes update #1
The Council's timetable for a decision on East Chiswick Controlled Parking Zone (EC CPZ) has slipped from May and the target is now the June 28th meeting of the Area Committee at 7:30 pm Chiswick Town Hall. There is little new information other than neighbouring Thornton and Mayfield Avenues have the Council's analysis of parked vehicle survey data confirming that a significant number of vehicles from elsewhere in the EC CPZ park on their streets. This is the main reason why they understandably pressing for a smaller zone.
The Council have not shared proposed solutions and this may not happen before the Area Committee meeting. Feedback from residents has been limited, but mainly supports the status quo. The Council have their 2008/9 review survey data where the majority of UPR residents favoured retention of the current restricted hours of 9-19h - see here on this site for more background.
The outcome at the Area Committee meeting could be: -
If residents have any further views on this then they can be recorded as a comment to this entry.
The Council have not shared proposed solutions and this may not happen before the Area Committee meeting. Feedback from residents has been limited, but mainly supports the status quo. The Council have their 2008/9 review survey data where the majority of UPR residents favoured retention of the current restricted hours of 9-19h - see here on this site for more background.
The outcome at the Area Committee meeting could be: -
- A 3 street zone on current restricted parking hours 9-19h (i.e. Thornton and Mayfield Avenues plus Upham Park Road)
- Shorter restricted hours (perhaps 10-12h and 14-16h) with the EC CPZ loosing Thornton/Mayfield
- EC CPZ loosing Thornton/Mayfield but otherwise no change for Upham Park Road
- No change - perhaps unlikely given that this has been a Thornton/Mayfield concern for years.
If residents have any further views on this then they can be recorded as a comment to this entry.
Thursday, 3 March 2011
Email on Parking and Links
The following was sent by Graham Tigg to residents on the committee's email list 3-March-2011.
Back in 2008/9 there was a review of the East Chiswick Controlled Parking Zone (EC CPZ) that included a survey/questionnaire of all residents in the zone. Hounslow Council identified that the majority of the streets (those away from stations and the High Road shops) were in favour of shorter hours than the current 9am to 7pm. Exceptions to this on our patch were UPR along with Thornton plus Mayfield Avenues. At the time, the Thornton/Mayfield Residents’ Association also requested a standalone zone for their roads.
More information on the 2008/9 review can be found here
We know from the Council that that a proposal/recommendation will be taken to Chiswick Area Committee meeting in May 2011 (at the earliest). This is tied in with a similar review of the Mid-Chiswick CPZ as some zone re-alignment may be possible.
From the Upham Park Road perspective concerns around this include: -
For now, I would appreciate any comments you have, including how easy you find it to park in the street. One resident has told me they perceive Sunday’s to have been busier since Westfield opened. Sunday night is usually tough for some reason.
Back in 2008/9 there was a review of the East Chiswick Controlled Parking Zone (EC CPZ) that included a survey/questionnaire of all residents in the zone. Hounslow Council identified that the majority of the streets (those away from stations and the High Road shops) were in favour of shorter hours than the current 9am to 7pm. Exceptions to this on our patch were UPR along with Thornton plus Mayfield Avenues. At the time, the Thornton/Mayfield Residents’ Association also requested a standalone zone for their roads.
More information on the 2008/9 review can be found here
We know from the Council that that a proposal/recommendation will be taken to Chiswick Area Committee meeting in May 2011 (at the earliest). This is tied in with a similar review of the Mid-Chiswick CPZ as some zone re-alignment may be possible.
From the Upham Park Road perspective concerns around this include: -
- No information on the likely impact of any zone changes on UPR parking pressure
- A three street zone (Thornton/Mayfield plus UPR) seems too restrictive at busy parking periods. Currently we can find spaces in our zone, even if it’s a bit of a walk.
- A Thornton/Mayfield two street zone may displace permit holders into UPR – this is because they suspect vehicles from elsewhere in the zone park there during the day
- Staying in the current EC zone may mean shorter hours and/or just a Monday to Friday scheme.
- Your UPRRA Committee have been in contact with Councillors, the Council and the Thorton/Mayfield Association. The next step is to feed back our views to the Council by the end of March.
For now, I would appreciate any comments you have, including how easy you find it to park in the street. One resident has told me they perceive Sunday’s to have been busier since Westfield opened. Sunday night is usually tough for some reason.
Sunday, 27 February 2011
Committee Meeting 22nd February 2011
Present
Carol Stone (Host, Chair)
Graham Tigg (Treasurer, Minutes)
Jackie Aust-Lean
Richard Palmer
Apologies
Marise Lee
Matters arising from the AGM
The Snickett seems have been regularly cleaned for the past few months.
Recycling collection calendars have been delivered to residents. The resident who complained at the AGM about kitchen waste not being collected reliably now leaves the green bin in a more obvious place (but still behind a low wall) and no longer has problems.
Rubbish in the road on collection day continues to be an issue. The majority of this is kitchen waste and it seems some residents still leave this in general waste (plastic sacks) that animals break into.
Nobody has expressed interest in joining the committee.
Parking and CPZ
The committee has been sent the Thornton-Mayfield Residents’ Association February Newsletter. This states that a parking proposal will be taken to the Chiswick Area Committee (Monitoring) in March* and that the nature of this proposal is for a separate CPZ (Controlled Parking Zone) for Thornton and Mayfield Avenues plus Upham Park Road. The agenda will be published on the Council website link here the week before.
* Subsequent to the meeting we know from the Council this will be the May meeting.
The background to this includes: -
From the Upham Park Road perspective concerns around this include: -
Actions:
Carol will contact Councillor Todd to establish how UPR becomes involved with any proposals.
Graham will monitor the agenda for the May meeting
Graham will draft a communication to residents
Dates of next meeting
To be arranged by email.
Carol Stone (Host, Chair)
Graham Tigg (Treasurer, Minutes)
Jackie Aust-Lean
Richard Palmer
Apologies
Marise Lee
Matters arising from the AGM
The Snickett seems have been regularly cleaned for the past few months.
Recycling collection calendars have been delivered to residents. The resident who complained at the AGM about kitchen waste not being collected reliably now leaves the green bin in a more obvious place (but still behind a low wall) and no longer has problems.
Rubbish in the road on collection day continues to be an issue. The majority of this is kitchen waste and it seems some residents still leave this in general waste (plastic sacks) that animals break into.
Nobody has expressed interest in joining the committee.
Parking and CPZ
The committee has been sent the Thornton-Mayfield Residents’ Association February Newsletter. This states that a parking proposal will be taken to the Chiswick Area Committee (Monitoring) in March* and that the nature of this proposal is for a separate CPZ (Controlled Parking Zone) for Thornton and Mayfield Avenues plus Upham Park Road. The agenda will be published on the Council website link here the week before.
* Subsequent to the meeting we know from the Council this will be the May meeting.
The background to this includes: -
- There was a review of the East Chiswick CPZ in 2008/9 that included a survey/questionnaire of all residents in the zone - results of the review are linked to this page (PDF files)
- The review report noted that “Thornton Avenue, Mayfield Avenue and Upham Park Road form a smaller inclusive area supporting retention of the existing operational times. The Thornton/Mayfield Residents’ Association has requested a standalone zone, which Members may wish to consider especially in view of the consultation responses”
- The review concluded “The decision on Mayfield Avenue, Thornton Avenue and Upham Park Road be deferred until the outcome of the Mid-Chiswick CPZ review is reported”
- The Mid-Chiswick CPZ report is expected to be presented in May 2011.
- The report states that for the whole of the East Chiswick CPZ there are 100 more parking bays than issued permits.
From the Upham Park Road perspective concerns around this include: -
- Council consultation with UPR residents over any changes
- No information on the likely impact of any changes on UPR parking pressures
- A three street zone (with UPR) seems too restrictive and parking elsewhere in the current zone when the road is full (typically Sunday and other evenings) would presumably not be an option.
- A Mayfield/Thornton two street zone may displace out-of-street permit holders into UPR.
Actions:
Carol will contact Councillor Todd to establish how UPR becomes involved with any proposals.
Graham will monitor the agenda for the May meeting
Graham will draft a communication to residents
Dates of next meeting
To be arranged by email.
Tuesday, 14 December 2010
Annual Genaral Meeting 25th November 2010 Minutes
Present
Graham Tigg (Treasurer, Chair)
Jackie Aust-Lean (Committee member)
Marise Lee (Committee member)
Carol Stone (Committee member, Minutes)
10 Residents
Apologies
Richard Palmer (Committee member)
1. The Chairman welcomed those present and introduced members of the Committee. A special thank you was given to Jackie for hosting the AGM and Carol for her work in progressing most of the actions over the past year.
Overview of the year 2009-2010
2. The Chairman provided a brief resume of the Committee’s work during the past year.
Street maintenance and road markings
In response to repeated requests by the Committee, the residents’ parking road markings had been repainted in late spring/early summer. This work had been necessary following pipe replacement work undertaken by Thames Water several years ago.
In cases where paving stones had been lifted by tree roots the Council’s remedy was to resurface the area with tar macadam, which was unsightly.
Trees/leaf clearance
Extensive pruning of the trees in the road had taken place in December 2008 on a regular three-yearly cycle. The growth at the foot of the trees tended to be removed by the Council on request, with some residents dealing with those trees directly outside their premises. Leaf clearance had recently taken place, unfortunately before most of the leaves had fallen (subsequent to the AGM full street cleaning took place in December).
Residents thought that it would be helpful to have a timetable. The Chairman observed that, because it was not possible to close the road for street cleaning, individual residents with vehicles had some responsibility to facilitate cleaning access.
The ‘snickett’
In 2009 the possible installation of CCTV cameras, for security purposes, at the UPR end of the footpath beside the railway embankment to Turnham Green Terrace (the snickett), had been raised with the Council. Following a number of reminders, one of our Homefields councillors eventually advised this would be a matter for Transport for London (TfL). Those present at the meeting agreed that the matter should not be pursued further: there was no history of incidents in the snickett and the overhead lighting had been improved. There continued to be a problem, however, during the summer months from overhanging trees in the back gardens of the houses along the north side of Thornton Avenue. A group of UPR residents had cut back some of the overhanging branches (subsequent to the AGM overhanging foliage had been cut back again). The committee appreciates this independent action by residents.
TfL contract the Council to clean the snickett and the Committee reminds the Council of this as necessary.
Refuse/recycling collection
On the whole the new arrangements for the weekly collection of refuse and recycling appeared to be working well although there continued to be some confusion about the fortnightly alternating collections of garden waste and plastics. It was noted that residents had not received up-to-date collection date calendars from the Council. Also noted was that pavements and the road were often strewn with litter following collections. One resident complained that, despite having contacted the Council on numerous occasions, her food waste container was not collected from the boundary of her property. The Committee undertook to raise the foregoing matters with the Council (subsequent to the AGM the Council have sent residents new collection calendars as requested).
LMC planning application
3. Residents had been informed of revised proposals for the redevelopment of the site at 104-108 Chiswick High Road. They are substantially similar to those approved in April 2010 but no longer retain the existing front elevation of the building – it will be rebuilt in the same style instead. The Committee did not wish to make any further comments on this application. Residents could view the plans and follow progress online here http://planning.hounslow.gov.uk/Planning_CaseNo.aspx?strCASENO=P/2010/3115
(note that the library provides online facilities for this).
Mice
4. In response to a comment by a new resident at the 2009 AGM about the presence of mice in their house, the meeting noted that this was a common problem in the road, exacerbated by the long terraces of houses. The Chairman advised that the Committee had discussed a request for a coordinated eradication programme involving a number of properties and rejected it as being logistically too complicated. The Council operates a pest control service for which a charge was normally made.
Treasurer’s report
5. In his capacity as Treasurer, the Chairman reported that there was £547.75 in the Association’s account, compared with £570.02 in November 2009. £15 had been received in donations and £0.45 in interest. £30.50 expenses had been incurred for the 2009 AGM plus £7.22 for photocopying of the 2010 AGM flyer.
UPRRA Website
6. The Chairman mentioned the Website which he had established for the UPRRA at www.uprra.blogspot.com. At present it included information about the Residents’ Association, including its genesis, terms of reference and achievements.
7. The site can be used to communicate with residents with internet access and readers can comment on entries.
The Chairman asked attendees to include their email addresses on the attendance list. Resident’s names and email addresses would not be published on the website.
Committee membership
8. There were currently five members of the Committee. The Chairman invited any resident who was interested in serving on the Committee to contact one of the existing members. It was desirable that potential members should have easy access to email as this was the preferred method of communication between members and with Council officials.
Street party
9. The possibility of holding a street party in 2011 was discussed briefly. Such a party had been held in 1977 to mark the Queen’s silver jubilee. It was agreed that the views of residents should be canvassed before any approach to the Council should be made regarding the necessary permissions. The Chairman was asked to explore the possibility of seeking residents’ views via email and the website.
Dates of future meetings
10. The next AGM would be held in November 2011, on a date to be notified.
11. A Committee meeting would take place early in 2011 in order to take forward issues raised at this meeting.
12. The meeting ended at 9.50pm.
Graham Tigg (Treasurer, Chair)
Jackie Aust-Lean (Committee member)
Marise Lee (Committee member)
Carol Stone (Committee member, Minutes)
10 Residents
Apologies
Richard Palmer (Committee member)
1. The Chairman welcomed those present and introduced members of the Committee. A special thank you was given to Jackie for hosting the AGM and Carol for her work in progressing most of the actions over the past year.
Overview of the year 2009-2010
2. The Chairman provided a brief resume of the Committee’s work during the past year.
Street maintenance and road markings
In response to repeated requests by the Committee, the residents’ parking road markings had been repainted in late spring/early summer. This work had been necessary following pipe replacement work undertaken by Thames Water several years ago.
In cases where paving stones had been lifted by tree roots the Council’s remedy was to resurface the area with tar macadam, which was unsightly.
Trees/leaf clearance
Extensive pruning of the trees in the road had taken place in December 2008 on a regular three-yearly cycle. The growth at the foot of the trees tended to be removed by the Council on request, with some residents dealing with those trees directly outside their premises. Leaf clearance had recently taken place, unfortunately before most of the leaves had fallen (subsequent to the AGM full street cleaning took place in December).
Residents thought that it would be helpful to have a timetable. The Chairman observed that, because it was not possible to close the road for street cleaning, individual residents with vehicles had some responsibility to facilitate cleaning access.
The ‘snickett’
In 2009 the possible installation of CCTV cameras, for security purposes, at the UPR end of the footpath beside the railway embankment to Turnham Green Terrace (the snickett), had been raised with the Council. Following a number of reminders, one of our Homefields councillors eventually advised this would be a matter for Transport for London (TfL). Those present at the meeting agreed that the matter should not be pursued further: there was no history of incidents in the snickett and the overhead lighting had been improved. There continued to be a problem, however, during the summer months from overhanging trees in the back gardens of the houses along the north side of Thornton Avenue. A group of UPR residents had cut back some of the overhanging branches (subsequent to the AGM overhanging foliage had been cut back again). The committee appreciates this independent action by residents.
TfL contract the Council to clean the snickett and the Committee reminds the Council of this as necessary.
Refuse/recycling collection
On the whole the new arrangements for the weekly collection of refuse and recycling appeared to be working well although there continued to be some confusion about the fortnightly alternating collections of garden waste and plastics. It was noted that residents had not received up-to-date collection date calendars from the Council. Also noted was that pavements and the road were often strewn with litter following collections. One resident complained that, despite having contacted the Council on numerous occasions, her food waste container was not collected from the boundary of her property. The Committee undertook to raise the foregoing matters with the Council (subsequent to the AGM the Council have sent residents new collection calendars as requested).
LMC planning application
3. Residents had been informed of revised proposals for the redevelopment of the site at 104-108 Chiswick High Road. They are substantially similar to those approved in April 2010 but no longer retain the existing front elevation of the building – it will be rebuilt in the same style instead. The Committee did not wish to make any further comments on this application. Residents could view the plans and follow progress online here http://planning.hounslow.gov.uk/Planning_CaseNo.aspx?strCASENO=P/2010/3115
(note that the library provides online facilities for this).
Mice
4. In response to a comment by a new resident at the 2009 AGM about the presence of mice in their house, the meeting noted that this was a common problem in the road, exacerbated by the long terraces of houses. The Chairman advised that the Committee had discussed a request for a coordinated eradication programme involving a number of properties and rejected it as being logistically too complicated. The Council operates a pest control service for which a charge was normally made.
Treasurer’s report
5. In his capacity as Treasurer, the Chairman reported that there was £547.75 in the Association’s account, compared with £570.02 in November 2009. £15 had been received in donations and £0.45 in interest. £30.50 expenses had been incurred for the 2009 AGM plus £7.22 for photocopying of the 2010 AGM flyer.
UPRRA Website
6. The Chairman mentioned the Website which he had established for the UPRRA at www.uprra.blogspot.com. At present it included information about the Residents’ Association, including its genesis, terms of reference and achievements.
7. The site can be used to communicate with residents with internet access and readers can comment on entries.
The Chairman asked attendees to include their email addresses on the attendance list. Resident’s names and email addresses would not be published on the website.
Committee membership
8. There were currently five members of the Committee. The Chairman invited any resident who was interested in serving on the Committee to contact one of the existing members. It was desirable that potential members should have easy access to email as this was the preferred method of communication between members and with Council officials.
Street party
9. The possibility of holding a street party in 2011 was discussed briefly. Such a party had been held in 1977 to mark the Queen’s silver jubilee. It was agreed that the views of residents should be canvassed before any approach to the Council should be made regarding the necessary permissions. The Chairman was asked to explore the possibility of seeking residents’ views via email and the website.
Dates of future meetings
10. The next AGM would be held in November 2011, on a date to be notified.
11. A Committee meeting would take place early in 2011 in order to take forward issues raised at this meeting.
12. The meeting ended at 9.50pm.
Saturday, 13 November 2010
UPRRA AGM 2010 Notice
ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING
THURSDAY 25 NOVEMBER 2010 AT 7.30 pm
33 Upham Park Road
33 Upham Park Road
Come and meet your neighbours over drinks and nibbles - all residents are cordially invited to attend.
The aim is also to meet the people who live in our street so this year the meeting will be kept as informal as possible. Matters of local interest will be discussed, such as: -
- tree maintenance
- street cleaning
- refuse/recycling collection
Jackie Aust-Lean (No. 33)
Marise Lee (No. 10B)
Richard Palmer (No. 19)
Carol Stone (No. 56)
Graham Tigg, treasurer (No. 22).
If you have an item which you would like us to discuss, please contact a member of the Committee before 23 November.
PLEASE COME - WE HAVE PROVED OVER THE YEARS THAT COLLECTIVE ACTION CAN ACHIEVE RESULTS!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)